W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

[SVGMobile12] Issue SVGT12-175 not resolved

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:16:29 -0600
Message-ID: <43D9BABD.6020204@mit.edu>
To: www-svg@w3.org

In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0039.html I requested 
that the definition of an "SVG document fragment" be clarified, specifically as 
regards mixed-namespace contexts.  The text in section 5.1.1 [1] does not 
clarify this.  A simple case that is ambiguous per the current text:


I assume the "SVG document fragment" in this cases contains a single node, but 
that's not clear from the text, either in section 5.1.1 or in section 1.6 [2].

Also, in the same mail I requested a clarification for what happens with regard 
to the "SVG document fragment" when an <svg:svg> has another <svg:svg> as a 
descendant.  This does not seem to have been clarified.

I'm sorry, but issue SVGT12-175 is not resolved to my satisfaction.


Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 06:16:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:06 UTC