- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:16:29 -0600
- To: www-svg@w3.org
In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0039.html I requested
that the definition of an "SVG document fragment" be clarified, specifically as
regards mixed-namespace contexts. The text in section 5.1.1 [1] does not
clarify this. A simple case that is ambiguous per the current text:
<svg:svg>
<html:body>
<svg:rect/>
</html:body>
</svg:svg>
I assume the "SVG document fragment" in this cases contains a single node, but
that's not clear from the text, either in section 5.1.1 or in section 1.6 [2].
Also, in the same mail I requested a clarification for what happens with regard
to the "SVG document fragment" when an <svg:svg> has another <svg:svg> as a
descendant. This does not seem to have been clarified.
I'm sorry, but issue SVGT12-175 is not resolved to my satisfaction.
-Boris
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/struct.html#NewDocumentOverview
[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20051207/intro.html#TermSVGDocumentFragment
Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 06:16:39 UTC