W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [SVGMobile12][SVGT12-425]: Please extend the Last Call period

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:25:09 +0100
Message-Id: <BB51F375-0C00-4921-85DB-828DC4640F6D@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>

On Jan 12, 2006, at 21:13, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I agree with Maciej that moving to CR from the current draft is  
> probably not the
> right thing to do given the many oustanding issues and given the  
> amount of
> issues that have not been properly addressed when moving from LC2  
> to LC3.

As usual we will do our best to please all and to take into account  
all feedback to make the best spec we can within the imparted time  
frame, but we have alas already delayed beyond what several large  
driving adopters would consider good and we will have to make a  
difficult choice involving timeliness and adoption. I am certain that  
I speak for the whole WG when I say that we are extremely grateful  
for the quality of review that this specification has been  
increasingly getting (I'm only a little sorry to see that many if not  
the majority of these issues were already there in SVG 1.0 -- but  
that's certainly not your fault) and that we will not tolerate that  
this effort be squandered by not taking it into account. Whether or  
not the next step is LC or CR, all comments will be addressed. I for  
one would really like there to be another LC so that we can get  
further review of the changes, but I can only say that I'd prefer we  
go straight to CR rather than not see adoption since that would waste  
both your efforts and ours.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 20:25:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:33 GMT