W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [SVGMobile12] more on data types

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:07 +0100
Message-Id: <4C07677C-04A8-463E-8EF8-B4399A1E8067@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
To: thomas.deweese@kodak.com

On Jan 12, 2006, at 14:18, thomas.deweese@kodak.com wrote:
>    This is possible but is not IMHO how the SVG spec is currently  
> written.
> If the WG wants to adopt your interpretation then I would suggest  
> making
> it clearer that the 'ignore' only applies to the rendering and adding
> a fifth bullet to section 'C.2':
>         * The UA MAY display a highly visible indication that an
> unsupported
>           element, attribute, property, attribute value or property  
> value
> was
>           encountered.
>    However, given Robin's responses on this topic I doubt the WG would
> agree with your interpretation.

I don't see what in my reply gives you the impression that we  
wouldn't accept such a comment. If you feel that the specification is  
unclear on the fact that content checkers can display highly  
perceivable indications of all sorts of things (this includes non- 
conformant content that would not cause a UA to stop, but also  
perfectly conformant things that are bad ideas as I say in my  
previous post) then we certainly should add something.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 14:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:06 UTC