W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2006

RE: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: Conformance to uDOM

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0601031806480.2856@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> I definitely understand the points you are making below; however, the 
> W3C and the SVG WG will have to trade off the requirements of unified 
> HTML+SVG web browser implementers (which want to implement a single DOM 
> engine) and the requirements of other SVG workflows, such as JSR-226.

These workflows will use Java, right? And therefore won't be compatible 
with the ECMAScript-based Web browser environments?

If they won't be interoperable anyway, it doesn't seem like there is any 
reason for them to use the same interfaces.


> 3) Treat the uDOM as an SVG+Java-only thing. Thus, it would only be
> available via the Java language binding.

...sems fine.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2006 18:12:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:06 UTC