W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2006

RE: [SVGMobile12] parseXML method description has some wording that could be improved

From: Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:42:11 -0500
Message-ID: <1CA55DCF91707745A9B5091A303367E902434DB0@XCH43YKF.rim.net>
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>

Hi Boris,

Thanks very much for your review.  Responses to your comments are inline
> From: Boris Zbarsky

> The second paragraph starts with:  "The purpose of the 
> document parameter".  But this method has no parameter named 
> "document".  Similar issue in the last sentence of this paragraph.

The references to the document parameter have been updated with the name
of the parameter, contextDoc, as specified in the IDL.

> Step 3 has "mentionned", which should be "mentioned".

The typo has been fixed.

> I'm not sure what Step 4 means.  parseXML returns a Node.  
> What needs to be cast to Element and why, exactly?  Note that 
> importNode returns a Node...

The note that the return value is cast to Element has been removed.

> The description of the "contextDoc" parameter says: "The 
> Document object in the context of which to produce the 
> parsing.".  I don't think the parsing is being "produced", 
> exactly.  Perhaps "perform"?

Changing "produced" to "perform" makes good sense.  The sentence will be
updated as such.

Please let us know, within two weeks, whether these responses address
your comments.


Scott Hayman

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 18:42:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:07 UTC