- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:08:44 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Aug 10, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Chris Lilley wrote: > > Hello www-svg, > > W3C is pleased to announce that > > Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-SVGMobile12-20060810/ > > is a W3C Candidate Recommendation. Could the SVG Working Group please explain which part of the W3C Process Document allows going directly from Working Draft (the draft of http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-SVGMobile12-20060721/ ) to Candidate Recommendation, bypassing the Last Call stage? The only valid advancement step for a Working Draft that I see in the Process Document is to Last Call: "After republication as a Working Draft, the next forward step available to the Working Group is a Last Call announcement. The Last Call announcement may occur at the same time as the publication of the Working Draft." The SVG Working Group did not announce a Last Call for the July 21 Working Draft. If the SVG Working Group has been granted an exception to the requirements of the W3C Process, could the WG please explain who granted the exception and what the justification is? Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:09:21 UTC