Re: SVG12: uDOM vs DOMImplementation

On Jul 22, 2006, at 03:28, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>> After careful consideration, given that hasFeature is not broadly
>> used and that introducing it requires further specification work that
>> may cause compatibility problems with the DOM, the WG has decided to
>> pull that feature and any mention of it from SVG Tiny 1.2.
>
> Could you explain why there now is an empty DOMImplementation inter-
> face?

It provides a convenient location onto which implementations can add  
specific extensions.

Thank you for your comments,

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 17:00:20 UTC