Hello www-svg, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Andrew Shellshear wrote: >>I found three references to the SMIL Animation Recommendation, and fixed >>them: > > There are still two in svgudom.html which I do not mind so long as the > specification is then properly referenced (there is no entry for it in > refs.html, etc.) We had hoped to move completely to referencing SMIL 2.1, and we caught the references that we could update. But that specification does not have a DOM, so we have to reference SMIL Animation there still. You are correct that this means it needs to be listed in the references, we will add it back. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 20:55:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:53 GMT