- From: Nandini Ramani <Nandini.Ramani@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:43:54 -0700
- To: www-svg@w3.org, derhoermi@gmx.net
> > >* Nandini Ramani wrote: >> The SVG WG has responded to your comment on the SVGT 1.2 draft: >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Feb/0026.html >>Please let us know if the proposed change is acceptable. > >With the changes applied, the draft would be unclear about how this is >supposed to work for non-XML formats, and even for XML formats it would > > For the non-XML formats, there are a vast number of them and we do not intend to cover them all. However, if you have some suggested text, please send it to us. >be incorrect. As an example, XHTML allows to use both xml:lang and lang, >looking only at xml:lang would be incorrect. > > Quoting from the XHTML spec: "Use both the lang and xml:lang attributes when specifying the language of an element. The value of the xml:lang attribute takes precedence." So, looking at xml:lang would be correct. -Nandini >-- >Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de >68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ >
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 08:43:45 UTC