W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: SVGT 1.2: "evt" vs "event" as the implicit event argument to event handlers

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604242052310.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Friday, April 21, 2006, 11:37:17 PM, Maciej wrote:
> MS> A) I agree that changing what "event" or "evt" means for XHTML or  
> MS> HTML event handler attributes is out of scope for SVG.
> 
> When you say "changing", which is the published specification that would 
> change?

http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#event


> I ask because as far as we can tell there isn't one. But yes if this 
> were to change W3C-wide it would be WebAPI that would likely own that 
> spec.

The W3C has officially stated that it HTML is obsolete, so presumably the 
W3C is no longer the official place to go for HTML specs. (That, at least, 
is the only conclusion I can draw from the lack of any HTML errata 
released by the W3C in the past four years despite repeated requests both 
internally and externally.)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 20:56:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT