W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: SVG12: cumulative animation targets

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:01:58 +0200
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4v2i425fk296ijomqa1c5fdi0b6fe2pfd9@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Chris Lilley wrote:
>>>>> Every animation element must be defined as either cumulative or
>>>>> non-cumulative. An animation element may be defined as cumulative
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> only if addition is defined for the target attribute.
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>> If there is text in SVG Tiny 1.2 or SMIL 2.1 that rules out the
>> possibility of an animation target that may be target of additive
>> but not cumulative animation, this isn't it. So this does not
>> address my concern.
>
>Additive is given as a precondition of being cumulative.

I want to know when an animation element may be defined as cumulative. 

The text above says

  An animation element MUST NOT be defined as cumulative
  if addition is not defined for the target attribute.

It does *not* say

  An animation element MAY be defined as cumulative if
  addition is defined for the target attribute.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 17:02:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT