- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:01:58 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote:
>>>>> Every animation element must be defined as either cumulative or
>>>>> non-cumulative. An animation element may be defined as cumulative
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> only if addition is defined for the target attribute.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> If there is text in SVG Tiny 1.2 or SMIL 2.1 that rules out the
>> possibility of an animation target that may be target of additive
>> but not cumulative animation, this isn't it. So this does not
>> address my concern.
>
>Additive is given as a precondition of being cumulative.
I want to know when an animation element may be defined as cumulative.
The text above says
An animation element MUST NOT be defined as cumulative
if addition is not defined for the target attribute.
It does *not* say
An animation element MAY be defined as cumulative if
addition is defined for the target attribute.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 17:02:10 UTC