W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [SVGFull12] color

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:37:52 +0200
Message-ID: <883120057.20060421133752@w3.org>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

On Friday, April 21, 2006, 1:11:38 PM, Anne wrote:

AvK> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:06:29 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>> As you say its out of scope for SVGT12 so I altered the subject line.

AvK> Thanks.


>> Ian posted some helpful comments about the lexical space and the value  
>> space. Could you rephrase your question for Full and clearly separating  
>> the lexical and value spaces?

AvK> I can't find that e-mail unfortunately.

He made the point several times,but this email expresses it well

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Feb/0105.html

> Property computation has _nothing_ to do with the lexical space. It
> doesn't make the slightest difference if the computed value is an RGB
> colour or a hex colour or has three digits or six; a computed value is
> a value without a canonical representation.

> The computed value for 'fill' and 'stroke' should be an RGB triplet if
> the specified value was a color or the 'currentColor' keyword, an
> absolute IRI if the specified value was an IRI, or 'none' if the
> specified value was 'none'. You may wish to also say something about
> 'inherit' if you are ignoring the CSS model (which makes 'inherit' a
> globally defined part of the syntax instead of a per-property value).


AvK>  What I'd like to know if the value
AvK> of 'fill' (in CSS context) needs to be parsed as <color> or parsed as  
AvK> <SVGColor> or some such. The latter seems not really desirably...

Are you taking the <color> definition from CSS1, CSS2, CSS 2.1 or CSS3:
Color?






-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 11:37:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:34 GMT