- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:20:52 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Dear Ian, This is the SVG Working Group response to your comment found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005May/0131.html It is a good general suggestion for the specification to express text using "The UA must..." and "The author must..." (although it is probably better to define a requirement on the content, not the author, much SVG content is generated by software). However, we will not take on the huge task of checking every line of the SVG spec. Most of the existing SVG spec is retained from previously approved SVG Recommendations. However, we have already made a series of spec changes in light of your suggestions and will take this good suggestion into account in future editing work. If there are other specific comments about particular sections of the specification, such as the comment about 'contentScriptType' in this email, we will respond to those specific comments. Relative to your comment about contentScriptType, we have changed the definition of contentScriptType to say: This language must be used for all scripts that do not specify the scripting language. Thank you for your feedback. Please let us know if this does not address your concerns. We will assume that you accept this response if two weeks pass without further postings on this subject. Jon Ferraiolo Adobe Systems, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 17:34:57 UTC