- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:01:19 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Monday, April 25, 2005, 1:15:51 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Chris Lilley wrote: >>No, CSS 2.0 is referenced. BH> Yes, since http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-SVG2Reqs-20020422/ SVG must BH> take into account updates to the CSS specifications The CSS2 Recommendation has not yet been superceeded by a CSS 2.1 Recommendation. Indeed, until recent last call comments tried to get the CSS WG to clarify their policy, it was not at allclear whether CSS 2.1 added to, or replaced, CSS 2.0. And then of course there is the issue that parts of the CSS2.0 Rec, used by SVG, are not in CSS 2.1 but have been removed and may perhaps show up in a future CSS3. So in consequence, we are unable to reference a mixture of the CSS 2.1 Working Draft and some CSS3 Working Drafts. BH> and the Last Call BH> announcement http://www.w3.org/mid/559793008.20050416012440@w3.org BH> did not indicate that this requirement has not been met as required BH> in http://www.w3.org/2004/02/02-transitions.html#lcannounce I assume BH> that this is an error in the draft, In this case your assumption would be incorrect. BH> just like the reference to RFC BH> 2396, the XML Base CR, Unicode 4.0.0, RFC 2279, XHTML 1.0 FE, etc. on those ones, your assumption was correct and the references have been updated to the current Recommendations or the later RFCs. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 16:01:32 UTC