- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:32:44 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 9:49:57 AM, Robin wrote: RB> Dear Björn, RB> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> In http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/text.html the >> tBreak element is defined as "The 'tBreak' element is an empty element >> that forcibly breaks the current line of text." The draft is unclear >> what this means for e.g. the sequence <tBreak/><tBreak/>, please change >> the draft to clearly define processing for such a case. RB> We clarify that they collapse similar to br as defined by the relevant RB> specification. Here is the relevant text. In fact, it does not define the behaviour by reference to another specification: The 'tbreak' element is an empty element that forcibly breaks the current line of text. Multiple consecutive tbreak elements have the same effect on rendering as a single tbreak. >> This definition >> also contradicts section 19.1 which allows tBreak be non-empty. Please >> change the draft such that it is consistent about this. RB> No, the RNG states <empty/> but the NVDL allows foreign namespaces in RB> such instances, as detailed in chapter D. Please let us know within two weeks if this satisfies your comment. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 19:32:58 UTC