"must" seems correct to me, too. Jon Ferraiolo -----Original Message----- From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Boris Zbarsky Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 5:06 PM To: Chris Lilley Cc: www-svg@w3.org Subject: Re: [SVGT 1.2] Question on sizing of the outermost <svg> Chris Lilley wrote: > <p>Under these conditions, the 'svg' element should be treated as a > replaced element in a CSS context, so the positioning properties > establish the viewport's width.</p> > > Is there any particular reason for the should, rather than a must? No, past me writing English, not spec in that part of the mail ;). Making it a must makes sense to me. -BoriReceived on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 01:50:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:56 GMT