On Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 7:36:36 PM, Ian wrote: IH> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Chris Lilley wrote: >> >> As you are aware, CSS 2.1 removes items that the XSL and SVG >> specifications depend on, on the grounds that the HTML+CSS >> implementations do not use them. This makes referring to CSS 2.1 >> problematic, and the applicability of CSS 2.1 unclear. IH> Just in the interests of accuracy, it should be noted that the IH> grounds for removing the features was the lack of demonstrable IH> high-quality interoperability and the lack of tests, not anything to IH> do with HTML. This should probably be discussed on www-style instead, but also in the interests of accuracy, there is a lack of tests for a number of items that are still in CSS 2.1, and interoperable implementations exist of some removed features. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 18:43:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:54:56 GMT