W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2005

Re: SVG12: getPresentation* naming

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 04:47:03 +0200
To: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4297e349.26817046@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Dean Jackson wrote:
>the SVG Working Group is not allowed to "ignore" any issues.

Could you clarify for each of the following documents 

  * http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/
  * http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVGMobile12-20040813/
  * http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/
  * (first) SVG Tiny 1.2 Candidate Recommendation
  * (first) SVG 1.2 Candidate Recommendation

which comments have to be formally addressed at time of publication of
the document? Do you agree that under the previous Process document

[...]
  For a Last Call announcement up to and including publication as a
  Recommendation, the Working Group MUST [...] Formally address all
  issues raised about the document since the previous step.
[...] -- http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/

the answers would be

  * all since the previous step (First SVG 1.2 Working Draft)
  * all since the previous step (First Tiny 1.2 Working Draft)
  * all since the previous step (Previous Tiny 1.2 Last Call)
  * all since the previous step (Last Tiny 1.2 Last Call)
  * all since the previous step (Last SVG 1.2 Last Call)

and in case your answers differ, could you point me to where the Process
document notes this or in case of changes, where the changelog notes the
change?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 22 May 2005 02:46:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT