W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2005

Re: SVG12: XML 1.0 vs XML 1.1

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:13:14 +0200
To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <42bfba5a.18996953@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>You're going to need detailed references here, for as far as I can tell 
>from reading the XML 1.1 specification, an XML 1.0 document is indeed an 
>XML 1.1 document as well. I see no contradiction there.

XML 1.0 documents do not match http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#NT-prolog
as explained in section 1.3 of the current XML 1.1 Recommendation.

>> Please consider me dissatisfied with this response aswell; without any
>> detail on the changes, I cannot decide whether the changes are satis-
>> factory to me, and fixing stray references to XML 1.0 does not address
>> my concern about unclear data typing at all.
>
>Since the SVG specification now references XML 1.1 normatively 
>throughout, it is clear that any mention of a data construct imported 
>from XML is from XML 1.1.

Due to the problem above I am not sure what to make of this response.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 13:13:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT