W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > June 2005

RE: SVG12: get/setAttribute

From: Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:02:28 +0200
Message-ID: <586AE9F507AF5E4AA45364333D9E2FA2FB32B4@sesthsrv02.zoomon.local>
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>, "WG SVG" <w3c-svg-wg@w3.org>

Hi Björn,
You are completely right. My talk about tiny 1.1 udom is not relevant at all. I was confusing the JSR-226 tiny udom with the SVGT1.1 w3c specification :-(
I've replaced the old, wrong example with the one you provided.
/ola
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> Sent: den 14 juni 2005 00:10
> To: Ola Andersson
> Cc: www-svg@w3.org; WG SVG
> Subject: Re: SVG12: get/setAttribute
> 
> * Ola Andersson wrote:
> >The mail you refer to does no longer apply due to a later resolution
> >in the WG. Set/getAttributeNS do apply (as written in the LC-spec)
> >to svg elements.
> 
> Okay, the new example addresses my concern then, thanks.
> 
> >> >Example SVG 1.1 scripting has been changed to:
> >> ><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
> >> >    <rect id="myRect" x="10" y="20" width="200" height="300"
> fill="red"
> >> >        onclick="var width =  parseFloat(
> >> >        document.getElementById('myRect').getAttributeNS(null,
> 'width'));
> >> >        document.getElementById('myRect').setAttributeNS(null,
> 'width',
> >> (width+10));"/>
> >> ></svg>
> >>
> >> This seems overly complex to me, I think this should be
> >>
> >>   <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
> >>     <rect x="10" y="20" width="200" height="300" fill="red"
> >>         onclick="evt.target.width.baseVal.value += 10" />
> >>   </svg>
> >
> >This is not svg tiny 1.1 compliant. The idea is that the example should
> be
> >tiny 1.1 udom compliant. We should add baseProfile="tiny" to make this
> clear.
> 
> If you add baseProfile="tiny" the example would be non-compliant as SVG
> Tiny 1.1 does not allow the onclick attribute on <rect>. And turning it
> into a SVG Basic 1.1 document does not seem useful to me; but even then,
> SVG 1.1 does not mandate the 'document' object the example uses... So I
> think adopting my example is best.
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 07:02:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT