Dear Björn, > It is out of scope of SVG Tiny 1.2 to define what kind of content may be > labeled using this media type, please change the draft such that this > (incorrect) statement is removed and the normative definition of this > media type is referred to. The mention has been removed. For Tiny we may not intend to be more prescriptive regarding script support, however for Full we intend to add a statement along the lines of "if the user-agent recognizes 'application/ecmascript' as valid script content, then it MUST support at least E-262 third edition". The SVG WG would like to know what the ETA of a media type for E-357 is, should you happen to know it. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 15:11:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT