W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > January 2005

Re: This might be a stupid question...

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:47:10 +0100
To: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4241c7d3.234051812@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
>I think it would be better to say that changes to the 'version' attribute 
>after the document is initially parsed and loaded into the DOM will have no 
>effect on processing, versus saying such a DOM change is an error. It is 
>easier for user agents to ignore this sort of a DOM change than to add an 
>error check in case such a DOM change is attempted.

How would that work exactly for dynamically included SVG fragments? I'm
not sure I understand your point with respect to error processing, how
would this be different exactly from changing any other attribute to an
illegal value?
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 16:46:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:02 UTC