- From: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:04:04 +1100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Robin Berjon:
> In fact, if I read DOM 3 Core correctly, the attachement of the node to
> the tree appears to be irrelevant. If you look at the spec, the isId
> field on Attr says "when it is [of type ID] and its value is unique, the
> ownerElement of this attribute can be retrieved using the method
> Document.getElementById"[0]. Based on that, I would expect that given
> element 'el' not attached to the tree but belonging to document 'doc'
> and having an attribute 'foo' of value 'bar', if I did
> el.setIdAttribute('foo', true) it appears to be expected that
> doc.getElementById('bar') would return el.
In which case I guess there would be no need for getElementById on
XBLShadowTreeElement.
Cameron
--
e-mail : cam (at) mcc.id.au icq : 26955922
web : http://mcc.id.au/ msn : cam-msn (at) aka.mcc.id.au
office : +61399055779 jabber : heycam (at) jabber.org
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 11:04:13 UTC