W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: Grammatical errors

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: Andrew Shellshear <Andrew.Shellshear@cisra.canon.com.au>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512301538500.17886@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Andrew Shellshear wrote:
> > 
> > "Normally stroking involves calculating stroke outline of the shape's 
> > path in current user space and filling that outline with the stroke 
> > paint (color or gradient)."
> 
> I don't think it's *that* bad.

300 pages of English like that is literally headache inducing. Have you 
never read the specification cover-to-cover?


> Can you suggest an alternative, please?

"Normally, 'stroking' involves calculating the stroke outline of the 
shape's path in the current user space, and filling that outline with the 
stroke paint (either a color or a gradient)."


> > As others have pointed out, there are also a large number of typos.
>
> There were certainly a couple of typos, but I didn't think there were 
> very many. Did you catch any others?

I did not make notes of typos, as I am much more concerned about the 
fundamental problems in the spec at the moment -- there is no point 
reporting a typo when one is also requesting that the entire section be 
rewritten. I would normally assume that the working group continuously 
proof-reads its specification and will catch all the typos itself.

The number of typos I came across was noticable. I do no know if they are 
limited to those that were reported.


> > Please conduct a thorough proof-reading of the specification to 
> > correct the grammar and any typos.
>
> We've already done so, and we're sorry we missed a couple.

It is far, far more than a couple, especially in terms of grammar 
(missing definite articles are a recurring problem throughout the 
specification, especially in the new sections).


> However, I don't think the typos and grammar mistakes quoted so far are 
> unusual for a document of this size and nature, and I don't think it's 
> an embarrassment.

I beg to differ.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 30 December 2005 15:45:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:32 GMT