- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:50:44 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
* Chris Lilley wrote: >AP> According to LTRU correspondents in recent days, the solution is to >AP> cite RFC 3066's (or its successor's) official IETF status, which is >AP> as BCP 47. BCP 47 will always be the most current version of >AP> language tags, no matter what the RFC number assigned. Thus a better >AP> reference might be "IETF BCP 47, currently represented by RFC 3066". > >Excellent suggestion, the specification has been amended to say [BCP47] >instead of [RFC3066] and the references section has the wording you >suggest. Thanks. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 10:50:42 UTC