W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: SVG12: formal vs prose

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:32:37 +0100
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <6ql5r15sfc19na8nk9vhd686icubd3bqvp@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Chris Lilley wrote:
>BH> So you are saying that in the case above prose and schema could not be
>BH> in conflict and yet you agree that prose and schema are in conflict. No
>BH> sense it makes to me, sorry I am. So still failing to see how the text
>BH> under discussion is not redundant with D.3.1 (if appropriate at all), I
>BH> stand by my objection.
>
>We have considered your request to remove the third paragraph of D.2
>Terminology after "All examples are informative, not normative." on the
>grounds of redundancy with D.3.1.

I did not request that.

>We find that the indicated text contains important information not
>conveyed in D.3.1 and that its removal would therefore make the
>specification less precise. It would also reduce compliance to the QA
>Specification guidelines.

Ah, then it should be easy for the Working Group to cite a case in which
the text under discussion is obviously not redundant.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 18:32:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:32 GMT