W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Last Call: SVG Tiny 1.2

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:07:03 +0100
Message-Id: <784ED1C5-12AA-4037-8F2A-14EB987FDEC8@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>


On Dec 08, 2005, at 16:38, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> I won't have access to things like mail either, actually.

Wow.

> It's too bad that we're in this situation where people just want a  
> "spec" to bless whatever they're doing, whether the spec works well  
> or not.  :(

It's not so much that. They want the spec to work (and it does) but  
said spec is up against proprietary, non-RF, either non-standard or  
standardised by rubber-stamping what one company does (no matter how  
bad it is), and it is deemed better to have a spec out there to beat  
those other options even if it means that it may have a few bugs (but  
again, this draft is *much* better than the previous one) rather than  
try to get a perfect spec long after the market has been overtaken by  
crap alternatives.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 16:08:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:32 GMT