W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Last Call: SVG Tiny 1.2

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:41:22 +0100
Message-Id: <671B8684-7C12-4AB7-A342-35400DD655AC@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>

On Dec 08, 2005, at 02:25, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> But even if ignore that and ignore that would really like to look  
> at the resolutions of some comments other sent in, it's pretty much  
> physically impossible for me to look over just the responses to my  
> comments between now and when I get on a plane in a few days.

I know this may sound a touch weird but if you want to take a printed  
copy of the spec with you and mail (remember? those things you put in  
an envelope with a stamp on them and stuff) in the comments it'd  
work. You can find an address where Chris will receive them on http:// 
www.w3.org/People/chris/. (Even if you don't do this you might still  
want to go there and see the one and only picture of Chris with a tie.)

> May I suggest simply having a longer-than-minimal Last Call  
> period?  That would really help. ;)

We're under massive industry pressure to get the spec out and get it  
out yesterday, whether it has bugs or not. We're doing our best to  
produce a quality specification nevertheless (and I think LC3 is  
*much* better than any previous version) but a longer LC period was  
not an option. Even having a third last call at all had to be  
discussed and then diplomatically explained outside the WG to people  
who want that spec to have been a Rec in 2003.

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2005 10:42:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:05 UTC