W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: SVG12: animating xml vs css

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:04:45 +0200
To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <42f32466.213266875@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> As pointed out in related comments, the specification is unclear about
>> the exact requirements. Nevertheless I believe this to be incorrect,
>> please change the draft to either explain in detail why this is always
>> the case or such that it does not make such erroneous claims.
>Could you please detail the way in which you consider this claim to be 
>erroneous? It is unclear to us from your email what exactly you are 
>objecting to.

The previous draft did not have such a statement, the list of changes
does not note such a change in the processing model, and the statement
appears in an informative discussion about the pros and cons of the
presentation attributes, as such I consider it a claim rather than a
normative requirement which is then wrong as there is no such require-
ment in either the draft or any of its normative references as far as
I can tell. If this is meant to be a definition it would need to be in
the attributeType="XML" definition.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 24 April 2005 23:04:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:02 UTC