- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:59:16 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Monday, April 18, 2005, 12:59:10 AM, Bjoern wrote: BH> Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group, BH> From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/script.html BH> section 15.2 BH> [...] BH> This type of executable content must be source code for the ECMAScript BH> programming language (either of ECMA-262 3rd Edition, ECMA-327, or BH> ECMA-357). This code is executed in the context of this element's BH> owner document's global scope as explained above. BH> [...] BH> It is out of scope of SVG Tiny 1.2 to define what kind of content may be BH> labeled using this media type, please change the draft such that this BH> (incorrect) statement is removed and the normative definition of this BH> media type is referred to. I agree that what the media type definition says should not be contradicted. Do you have an up-to-date pointer to the latest registration document? However, we don't want people using ECA 2nd or 1st edition. Any suggestions on good wording to make that clear? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 20:59:19 UTC