W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: SVG12: app/ecmascript content

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:59:16 +0200
Message-ID: <2110675728.20050418225916@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

On Monday, April 18, 2005, 12:59:10 AM, Bjoern wrote:

BH> Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group,

BH>   From http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVGMobile12-20050413/script.html
BH> section 15.2

BH> [...]
BH>   This type of executable content must be source code for the ECMAScript
BH>   programming language (either of ECMA-262 3rd Edition, ECMA-327, or
BH>   ECMA-357). This code is executed in the context of this element's
BH>   owner document's global scope as explained above. 
BH> [...]

BH> It is out of scope of SVG Tiny 1.2 to define what kind of content may be
BH> labeled using this media type, please change the draft such that this
BH> (incorrect) statement is removed and the normative definition of this
BH> media type is referred to.

I agree that what the media type definition says should not be
contradicted. Do you have an up-to-date pointer to the latest
registration document?

However, we don't want people using ECA 2nd or 1st edition. Any
suggestions on good wording to make that clear?

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 20:59:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:02 UTC