W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Fwd: Two questions on flowed text in 1.2

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jon.ferraiolo@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 08:37:11 -0700
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, bulia byak <buliabyak@gmail.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-id: <6.1.1.1.2.20050417081834.0408e588@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

Bulia,
Looking forward to SVG Full 1.2 and an expanded <textArea> that supports 
arbitrary shapes, I have some questions for you:

1) Is Inkscape primarily interested in SVG for publishing (i.e., the SVG's 
are view-only) or SVG for applications (i.e., the SVG presents a user 
interface and users enter data which is sent back to a back-end server)? I 
would like to have a better understanding of the workflows for which 
Inkscape will be using <textArea>.

2) Do you want the various SVG viewers to perform rewrapping of text on the 
client side, and if so, do you require that the viewers wrap text exactly 
as your authoring tool? There are various situations where the viewer will 
wrap text differently than the authoring tool: (a) the SVG viewer may not 
implement all features completely or correctly, (b) complicated specs such 
as SVG tend to have at least a few errata, so even "correct" 
implementations might not have integrated errata completely at any given 
moment in time, (c) client systems will have a different set of installed 
fonts, (d) not all fonts with the same name are identical (e.g., Helvetica 
can vary from machine to machine), (e) different users install different 
localization packages, (f) mathematical issues such as some viewers using 
fixed point arithmetic versus others using double-precision floating point, 
plus accumulated round-off error. (This is not a complete list.) As I 
remember, the SVG wrapping text rules were that if a given "word" overflows 
all available regions, that word is just not visible. Therefore, if viewers 
wrap differently than an authoring tool, there is a chance that some text 
might get lost.

3) Do any of your workflows involve pouring dynamically-generated text into 
a <textArea>, where the SVG acts as a template?

Thanks.
Jon Ferraiolo


At 05:30 PM 4/16/2005, Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Saturday, April 16, 2005, 11:49:30 AM, bulia wrote:
>
>bb> We already have a pretty complete implementation of flowRoot in
>bb> Inkscape and we count on it as one of the major and most
>bb> user-requested features in the next release.
>
>Nice screenshot of this at
>http://www.inkscape.org/screenshots/gallery/inkscape-0.40-CVS-linux-flow-01.png
>
>
>
>--
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2005 15:40:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:30 GMT