Re: SVG 1.2 tiny

• From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
• Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:46:03 +0100
• To: www-svg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <clr485$n5a$1@sea.gmane.org>

"Antoine Quint" <ml@graougraou.com> wrote in message 
news:8626C696-28F7-11D9-BBAC-000393D124C4@graougraou.com...
> On 28 oct. 04, at 17:32, James Bentley wrote:
>> Any thoughts?
>
> That's impossible, this is an XML rule, not SVG, and we have to stick to 
> it.

Unless you wanted to come up with a new serialisation of the same infoset, 
perhaps one based on just a fractionally SGML declaration and you're all 
done :-)

Jim. 

Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 15:46:20 UTC