W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Proposals for SVG 1.2

From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:26:28 +1000
Message-ID: <418074F4.7090909@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: Mark McKay <mark@kitfox.com>, www-svg@w3.org

Mark,

Check section 10 of the specification and the comp-op property.
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12/rendering.html

Craig

Mark McKay wrote:

>
> One thing that Abobe did well - they added a Composite tag to their 
> SVG output.  This is something I would like to suggest the SVG working 
> comitee consider adding to the spec.  Essentially, it lets you do 
> brighten, darken, multiply, screen and all those useful Abode overlays 
> without having to have all the overhead of filters.  If you want to 
> apply a pixel tweaking effect that could be described by geomerty (ie, 
> have a circular area fade to blue, add shadows that tint rather than 
> obscure, brighten a region defined by a path, or make a rectangular 
> region monochrome, a Composite is a great, easy to implment and memory 
> saving technique over filters.
>
> Mark McKay
>
>
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 04:27:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:55 UTC