On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > Please adopt the style used in <http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt>, it's the > most readable notation I have come across in a specification and I know > from a lot of authors (including myself) that this notation greatly > helped them to learn the language. Unfortunately the (ad-hoc?) notation used in XSLT is not really expressive enough to describe the exact format of sXBL (e.g. the content model of <xbl:definition> elements). > This RelaxNG stuff along with these odd "Expected children" / "Expected > context" things is most difficult to access even for me. The "expected children" stuff is just English prose, it's not a schema language. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Saturday, 23 October 2004 16:33:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:29 GMT