W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: vector effects

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411291100490.24069@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote in message 
> news:Pine.LNX.4.61.0411290947010.24069@dhalsim.dreamhost.com...
> > But my point is a Web browser isn't, and shouldn't be, a "serious vector
> > graphics application".
> It's a vector graphics standard for the web, not a vector graphics standard 
> for the web-browser, there is a difference.

A clear statement in the spec one way or the other would definitely help 
me understand the intended implementors. If Web browsers aren't expected 
to support SVG 1.2, then many of my concerns would be alleviated. However, 
my understanding is that the working group _does_ intend SVG to be a 
vector graphics standard for (amongst other things maybe) Web browsers.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 29 November 2004 11:07:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:01 UTC