Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: image/svg+xml;charset="" from Bjoern Hoehrmann on 2004-11-23 (www-svg@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:15:08 +0100
To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <41ce6b9a.130836062@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>Take for instance:
>
>[~]$ HEAD http://expway.com/robin/foo.xml.sjis | grep Content-Type
>Content-Type: application/xml; charset=shift_jis
>[~]$ xmllint http://expway.com/robin/foo.xml.sjis
><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
><foo>éââéééé</foo>
>
>Is that conformant? What do you think most XML parsers do?

<http://www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/utf8-or-iso-8859-1.svg>, what do you
think SVG implementations like Batik do? They consider it ISO-8859-1.
So does the W3C Markup Validator and even MSXML4 does. What was your
point exactly?

Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 17:15:42 UTC