W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Reconsider SVG 1.2

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:21 -0600
Message-ID: <419BB681.7050103@mit.edu>
To: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
CC: "Thomas DeWeese"@MIT.EDU, www-svg@w3.org

Thomas DeWeese wrote:
>    I guess you missed all the follow up[4] to that where we discussed
> the fact that line-height handling is unclear in the SVG 1.2
> specification.

I did miss that, yes.  My apologies.

 > That said I don't see any reason the two couldn't
> produce identical results (assuming the SVG WG decided that a
> flowPara acts as a CSS Block for line-height calculations, which
> it probably makes sense to do).

Did I miss something?  Can't the text inside a flowPara wrap?  And then 
wouldn't the models described in SVG and CSS produce different layout of 
the resulting lines?  I thought that was the point of Ian's example...

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 20:39:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:01 UTC