W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

RE: SVG 1.2 Comments

From: James Bentley <James.Bentley@guideworkstv.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:04:59 -0700
Message-ID: <687B7858C99ED711B87B00B0D0D1C922C0FD8C@LAMBIC>
To: 'Scooter Morris' <scooter@cgl.ucsf.edu>, www-svg@w3c.org

What is the SVG WG response to the following comment - I may have missed it.
Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Scooter Morris
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 11:31 PM
To: www-svg@w3c.org
Subject: SVG 1.2 Comments

"
*
*General comments*
*It is my belief that the focus of SVG should be on Scalable Vector 
Graphics, regardless of the pressures put on the working group by 
constuencies that are hoping to provide a broader base upon which to 
build applications.  In Section 5.1 of the Architecture of the World 
Wide Web, it clearly states that "Orthogonal abstractions benefit from 
orthogonal specifications" and that "A specification should clearly 
indicate which features advance into territory rightfully governed by 
another specification."  "
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 16:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC