W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comments

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:21:22 +0100
To: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
Cc: Scooter Morris <scooter@cgl.ucsf.edu>, www-svg@w3c.org
Message-ID: <41a51605.1384125276@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Peter Sorotokin wrote:
>Yes - and one important difference about Last Call period is that the WG is 
>required to review (and, I think, respond) to all comments made on this list.

[...]
  A document receives review from the moment it is first published.
  Starting with the First Public Working Draft until the start of a
  Proposed Recommendation review, a Working Group MUST formally address
  any substantive review comment about a technical report and SHOULD do
  so in a timely manner.
[...] -- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/process#doc-reviews

Where formally addressing an issue means

[...]
  In the context of this document, a group has formally addressed an
  issue when it has sent a substantive response to the reviewer who
  raised the issue. A substantive response is expected to include
  rationale for decisions (e.g., a technical explanation, a pointer to
  charter scope, or a pointer to a requirements document). The adequacy
  of a response is measured against what a W3C reviewer would generally
  consider to be technically sound.
[...] -- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/process#formal-address

Doing so is an entrance criterion for Last Call since February 2001,
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010208/process.html#last-call

[...]
  5.2.2 Last Call Working Draft

  Entrance criteria. Before advancing a technical report to Last Call
  Working Draft, the Working Group must:

  1. fulfill the relevant requirements of the Working Group charter and
     those of any accompanying requirements documents, or document which
     relevant requirements they have not fulfilled; 
  2. formally address all issues raised by Working Group participants,
     other Working Groups, the Membership, and the public about the
     Working Draft. 
[...]
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 14:22:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC