- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:00:02 -0000
- To: www-svg@w3.org
"Håkon Wium Lie" <howcome@opera.com> wrote in message >>As I'm sure you recall, I very much resisted the "filter" property >>when it was proposed. I don't think it belongs in CSS. However, when >>you search for "filter property" in Google what you get is MSFT. If >>you search for "filter property CSS" you get bunches of pointers to >>MS' stuff. > >This doesn't mean it's a standard in any way, but disregarding it >isn't an option either. No, but there's no problem in supporting both, other than being non-conformant to the limitation on the filter property to taking <uri>, none or inherit. The actual value space does not overlap at all. So whilst I agree that it can't be ignored, there's no problem, if you've decided to implement non-standard properties, a minor extension of the range of a CSS-property, that causes no problems isn't going to cause sleepless nights. Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 13:00:29 UTC