Re: SVG 1.2 Comments

On 10 nov. 04, at 12:26, Ian Hickson wrote:

> In the same vain, I don't think SVG should be "reusing" SMIL -- it 
> simply
> shouldn't be overlapping, and where authors need SMIL features, they
> should just be using the SMIL namespace in conjunction with SVG.

In the case of SMIL, there wasn't any other option since SMIL Animation 
has been designed to integrated within a host language.

Antoine
-- 
Antoine Quint <aq@fuchsia-design.com>
W3C Invited Expert (SVG and CDF)
SVG Consulting and Outsourcing
http://svg.org/user/graouts/diary

Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 11:32:27 UTC