W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: 4 Flowing text and graphics

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:50:54 +0100
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041105185054.GA3152@linux>

On Fri 2004-11-05 Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > This is the Web we're talking about, after all. SVG is primarily
> > > a Web language (that's why the World Wide Web Consortium is the
> > > forum in which it is being designed). On the Web, pixel-perfect
> > > accuracy is not as important as in the print world.
> > 
> > Batik gets complaints because the way we anti-alias content is
> > different from Adobe!  SVG is a graphics format, in a graphics
> > format there is a very high premium put on accuracy across
> > renderers.
> 
> Interesting. Could you point me to such complaints (off-list)? I'm
> curious to learn about this, since if Opera implements SVG we'll
> probably have the same issues.

He might have meant

  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12013

for example.

Tobi

-- 
to
  bi
    as
  re
if
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 18:48:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC