- From: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 01:26:01 +1100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On 6 Nov 2004, at 01:10, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > Dean Jackson: >> However, I get your point. This is a major reason why we started >> work on RCC (replaced by sXBL) a few years ago. We wanted to provide >> the highest possible level of semantics and accessibility in the >> document, >> and use SVG as a display/interaction layer. > > Do you think there will be any work in integrating RDF and XBL? It > seems to me (as I mentioned in my other message) that there could be > some advantage (in terms of richer semantic content) in doing so. I doubt there will be any such work for sXBL. It's an interesting thing to consider for XBL 2 though (although I guess what you're asking for is a model -> XML binding, rather than XML -> XML binding.... at this point my brain explodes). Dean
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 14:26:05 UTC