Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: Detailed last call comments (all chapters)

Dean Jackson:
> However, I get your point. This is a major reason why we started
> work on RCC (replaced by sXBL) a few years ago. We wanted to provide
> the highest possible level of semantics and accessibility in the 
> document,
> and use SVG as a display/interaction layer.

Do you think there will be any work in integrating RDF and XBL?  It
seems to me (as I mentioned in my other message) that there could be
some advantage (in terms of richer semantic content) in doing so.

Cameron

-- 
Cameron McCormack
|  Web: http://mcc.id.au/
|  ICQ: 26955922

Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 14:10:10 UTC