- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:19:45 -0600
- To: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Thomas DeWeese wrote: >> It seems bad to me to be requiring a lowest-common-denominator >> algorithm for line breaking. > > This is because you don't care about graphical interoperability > between user-agents. This is exactly why it's appropriate for the > SVG WG (where this is extremely important) to define this. I may have missed something, but what provisions are there for ensuring that the same font is used by all user-agents? Do documents fail to render altogether if a required font does not exist? If not, then what's the point of forcing an identical line-breaking algorithm if you can't even guarantee identical glyphs? -Boris
Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 23:20:10 UTC