W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: 4 Flowing text and graphics

From: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:32:56 -0800
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-id: <5.2.0.9.2.20041101023048.031e7f58@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

At 09:24 AM 11/1/2004 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > So far I am not sure how exactly your proposal would differ in terms of
> > glyph positioning. It appears that your proposal effectively rephrases
> > SVG 1.2 algorithm.
>
>My proposal is merely an extension to the CSS model. It is quite different
>from the proposed SVG model, which is itself quite different from the CSS
>model (for example, the SVG model does not support 'line-height' or
>'vertical-align', and doesn't support the CSS box model on inlines).

Can you name a case where your proposal would produce different result from 
SVG 1.2, if no features which are not in SVG 1.2 are used? Having analyzed 
the algorithm I do not see the difference you are talking about.

Peter
Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 10:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC