- From: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 02:32:56 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
At 09:24 AM 11/1/2004 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote: > > So far I am not sure how exactly your proposal would differ in terms of > > glyph positioning. It appears that your proposal effectively rephrases > > SVG 1.2 algorithm. > >My proposal is merely an extension to the CSS model. It is quite different >from the proposed SVG model, which is itself quite different from the CSS >model (for example, the SVG model does not support 'line-height' or >'vertical-align', and doesn't support the CSS box model on inlines). Can you name a case where your proposal would produce different result from SVG 1.2, if no features which are not in SVG 1.2 are used? Having analyzed the algorithm I do not see the difference you are talking about. Peter
Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 10:32:59 UTC