W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: SVGTimer complaints

From: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:02:06 -0800
To: Jan-Klaas Kollhof <keyjaque@yahoo.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Message-id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040307160059.02368850@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com>

At 12:31 PM 3/7/2004 -0800, Jan-Klaas Kollhof wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Why is the runnable interface needed.
>The timer fires an event.
>This event should be handled by a handler.

SVG WG has already decided to do it though event handler, but it
has not filtered down to the draft yet.

Peter

>We already have interfaces for adding listeners
>and also interfaces for the handlers (DOM).
>
>I think
>
>   t = createAndSartTimer(500);
>   t.addEventListener(l)
>
>is easier to understand because people know the
>concept
>and it makes more sense with respect to all other
>objects/interfaces that fire events.
>
>
>Jan
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Search - Find what you're looking for faster
>http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:01:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:26 GMT