- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:28:39 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-svg@w3.org
> Although, we couldn't really tell people what to do with the XLink > namespace anyway. Surely the real problem here is that, in spite of popular beliefs, most of the other standards are about structural semantics, whereas SVG is about presentation. Coming up with a valid meaning for a merger of two structural standards is easier than combining something with only implied presentation with something that is already supposed to more or less fully define it.
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 17:42:36 UTC