Chris Lilley wrote: > On Thursday, July 15, 2004, 2:25:27 PM, Robin wrote: > RB> It returns an SVGColor object. As far as I can tell, that points to a > RB> css::RGBColor which in turn does not support the alpha value. I might > RB> have missed something, but if not I would call that a bug. > > In addition to adding opacity (ideally by fractional geometric coverage) > don't we need to say what the sampling method is? Otherwise its trivial > to produce content that will give wildly different results. You're Mr.Colour so I might be missing something but currently getPixel () is defined to work on "binary (pixel-based) images only" (a definition which could be improved by dropping the "binary", just in case someone adds XPM support) and therefore the x and y are pixels in the image's intrinsic pixel-based coordinate system. I believe that the motivation for that was that anything else was deemed Too Complex For 1.2(r). -- Robin BerjonReceived on Thursday, 15 July 2004 12:02:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:59 UTC