- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:29:49 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > If you ignore for a second that the proposed image/svg+xml registration > does not refer to http://w3.org/TR/SVG11/linking#FragmentIdentifiersSVG > this should be well-defined already since sXBL can only be used when > included in SVG 1.2 documents. Things might be less well-defined if the > referenced document is not a conforming image/svg+xml SVG 1.2 document, > though. The import element is normally intended to point at sXBL documents (if I'm reading the spec right; I might not be). has a MIME media type been chosen for sXBL documents yet? In particular, is it likely to be image/svg+xml or something else? -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 23:29:52 UTC